Re: error context for vacuum to include block number

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:30:25PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> * I think the function name is too generic. init_vacuum_error_callback
> or init_vacuum_errcallback is better.

> * The comment of this function is not accurate since this function is
> not only for heap vacuum but also index vacuum. How about just
> "Initialize vacuum error callback"?

> * I think it's easier to read the code if we set the relname and
> indname in the same order.

> * The comment I wrote in the previous mail seems better, because in
> this function the reader might get confused that 'rel' is a relation
> or an index depending on the phase but that comment helps it.

Fixed these

> * rel->rd_index->indexrelid should be rel->rd_index->indrelid.

Ack.  I think that's been wrong since I first wrote it two weeks ago :(
The error is probably more obvious due to the switch statement you proposed.

Thanks for continued reviews.

-- 
Justin