Hi,
On 2018-03-24 13:34:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That was my first thought as well, since this seems to have changed
> quite recently. I don't think it's a bad idea to be collecting typedefs
> from something that compiles that code, because otherwise our own
> typedefs in that area won't be known.
The number of typedefs we actually use is fairly small (~5-7), so we
could realistically maintain the them manually.
I'm about to head out, but afterwards I'm going to check what the
typedefs collected actually are when LLVM is enabled.
Greetings,
Andres Freund