Re: GSOC 2018 proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: GSOC 2018 proposal
Дата
Msg-id 20180312082503.GA31289@e733.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на GSOC 2018 proposal  (Charles Cui <charles.cui1984@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: GSOC 2018 proposal  (Charles Cui <charles.cui1984@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello Charles,

> I am currently preparing a proposal for pg_thrift project. I noticed
> that there are several protocols supported by thrift, which ones do we
> have higher priority? I mean which ones I need to implement during
> this project?

Binary protocols, i.e. TBinaryProtocol and TCompactProtocol. The first
one is a bit faster but more redundant, the second one is slower but
more compact. It's your choice which one to implement first, but at
least one binary protocol should be fully supported (ideally - both).

As far as I'm aware other protocols are rarely used and are not fully
implemented in most existing libraries.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anthony Bykov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transform for pl/perl
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries