On 2018-02-12 09:23:43 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Thomas Munro
> > <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >> I think it should be (size_t) 1, not UINT64CONST(1). See attached.
> >
> > Okay, that makes sense. Do you think we should also change type
> > casting in BUCKETS_PER_PARTITION so that we are consistent?
>
> +1
>
> Here's a patch to fix that. I was reminded to come back and tidy this
> up when I spotted a silly mistake in a nearby comment, also fixed in
> this patch.
Pushed.
Thanks,
Andres