Hi,
On 2018-01-10 15:05:39 +0100, Julian Markwort wrote:
> I'd like to follow up to my previous proposition of tracking (some) best and
> worst plans for different queries in the pg_stat_statements extension.
Cool feature.
I think the patch probably doesn't apply anymore, due to other changes
to pg_stat_statements since its posting. Could you refresh?
I've not done any sort of review. Scrolling through I noticed //
comments which aren't pg coding style.
I'd like to see a small benchmark showing the overhead of the feature.
Both in runtime and storage size.
Greetings,
Andres Freund