Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions
От
Alvaro Herrera
Тема
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions
Дата
Msg-id
20160701164505.GA304870@alvherre.pgsql
Ответ на
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions (Merlin Moncure)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass'
optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one
time pass' optimizable expressions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Merlin Moncure wrote: > It's pretty easy to craft a query where you're on the winning side, > but what's the worst case of doing two pass...is constant folding a > non trivial fraction of planning time? One thing that has been suggested is to re-examine the plan after planning is done, and if execution time is estimated to be large (FSVO), then run a second planning pass with more expensive optimizations enabled to try and find better plans. The guiding principle would be to continue to very quickly find good enough plans for frequent/small/simple queries, but spend more planning effort on more complex ones where execution is likely to take much longer than planning time. So doing constant-folding twice would be enabled for the second planning pass. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата: