Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
Дата
Msg-id 20160601162412.GA44212@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
> >> and back-branches?
> >
> > Sounds sensible to me.
> 
> I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
> PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
> extension they are writing, but I don't mind changing this in master.

I wonder why is that -- just to reduce the commit load?  I don't think
this kind of change is likely to break anything, is it?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens