On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:00:39PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > >>>Note: This form of IN is not truly a subquery expression, but it seems
> best
> > to document it in the same place as subquery IN.
>
> Does the attached patch improve this?
>
>
> I'd append "scalar" to the id to distinguish in from the subquery version.
> Otherwise any suggest I make seems like overkill. The main point being the
> "list of scalars" is not a term we use on the referenced page, and the chapter
> header indicates "Row and Array" of which this is similar but technically
> neither.
>
> <sect2 id="functions-comparisons-in-scalar"> [...]
>
> [...] rely on the <link linkend="functions-comparison-in-scalar">array</link>
> form of [...]
Sorry, there was already a link in that place --- I had linked to the
wrong spot. New patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +