Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
От
fkater@googlemail.com
Тема
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
Дата
Msg-id
20100114201854.GC2384@comppasch2
Ответ на
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? (Matthew Wakeling)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "Fernando Hevia" <fhevia@ip-tel.com.ar>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? "fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud<lists@peufeu.com>
Thanks a lot for the detailed reply. Matthew Wakeling: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, fkater@googlemail.com wrote: > > This takes about 50s, so, 800MB/50s = 16MB/s. > > > > However the harddisk (sata) could write 43 MB/s in the worst > > case! Why is write performance limited to 16 MB/s? > > Several reasons: > > The data needs to be written first to the WAL, in order to provide > crash-safety. So you're actually writing 1600MB, not 800. I understand. So the actual throughput is 32MB/s which is closer to 43 MB/s, of course. Can I verify that by temporarily disabling WAL writes completely and see if the thoughput is then doubled? Felix
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: fkater@googlemail.com
Дата:
От: fkater@googlemail.com
Дата: