On Monday 07 December 2009 02:12:43 Greg Smith wrote:
> After getting off to a good start, it looks like this patch is now stuck
> waiting for a second review pass from Kevin right now, with no open
> items for Andres to correct. Since the only issues on the table seem to
> be that of code aesthetics and long-term planning for this style of
> implementation rather than specific functional bits, I'm leaning toward
> saying this one is ready to have a committer look at it. Any comments
> from Kevin or Andres about where this is at?
I think it should be ready - the only know thing it needs is a
s/usefull/useful/.
I will take another look but I doubt I will see anything new.
Andres