-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:31:14 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > So on reflection I'm now inclined to say we should not change what
> > we are now doing, which is simply to allow the db owner to install
> > and control access to the language.
>
> +1. It's worth pointing out here that we just changed the rules in
> 8.3 to make this easier. We should at least wait to gain some field
> experience with 8.3 before we conclude that we need to change them
> again.
Not really sure what to think here. On the one hand I agree that since
the dbowner can load it at their leisure its cool. On the other hand I
wonder why we continue to add extra unnecessary steps to our life. Yes,
it is a simple step but it is one that doesn't need to be taken, so why
are we making people expend the calories on it?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHvwj/ATb/zqfZUUQRAnbeAJ0QOGN6oNs+IzdQLpB9VZ2p1grmegCeN4Zc
ZbOO5Rg1fPce1eIFdx+YAWs=
=rqrK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----