Re: Ad Hoc Indexes
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes
Дата
Msg-id
200802182245.40077.peter_e@gmx.net
Ответ на
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes (Hans-Juergen Schoenig)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Ad Hoc Indexes Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres@cybertec.at>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes "Stephen Denne" <Stephen.Denne@datamail.co.nz>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes "Stephen Denne" <Stephen.Denne@datamail.co.nz>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Ad Hoc Indexes Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>
Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote: > this kind of indexing makes sense if you visit the same data over and > over again. WITH-queries would be an example for that and self joins > could benefit from the this feature too. Yes, for joins it is useful. We have hash joins, which are kind of ad hoc hash indexes. If anyone wants to implement a btree join, that might work. :) But I think we essentially support what the OP is asking for, it is just under different labels. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления