Re: Timestamps without time zone
От
Achilleas Mantzios
Тема
Re: Timestamps without time zone
Дата
Msg-id
200801091805.26891.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Ответ на
Re: Timestamps without time zone (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Re: Timestamps without time zone Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Στις Wednesday 09 January 2008 17:42:57 ο/η Tom Lane έγραψε: > Achilleas Mantzios writes: > > ���� Wednesday 09 January 2008 15:05:24 �/� Oliver Jowett ����� ��: > >> Ah, there is your problem then. That is a very old driver and had > >> problems with exactly the case you're trying to use (setTimestamp() with > >> a Calendar), amongst many other bugs. > > > > Just a comment: > > Why not merge from current changes/bugfixes to the JDBC? > > I mean 7.4 is old ok, but *officially supported* also! > > Back-patching this type of behavioral change would be a seriously bad > idea, because it would break applications that are expecting the old > behavior. That is true indeed, but on the other hand a lot of people write extremely buggy code (and some times intentionally as in my case) in order to deal with those old JDBC drivers bugs. I mean those people would have to face the reality sooner or later when upgrading to 8.x, why not force them to take the action earlier, when, in addition, the new correct behaviour adheres to the JDBC spec, whereas the old one didnt? > > regards, tom lane -- Achilleas Mantzios
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления