Re: Quick Performance Poll
От
Jim C. Nasby
Тема
Re: Quick Performance Poll
Дата
Msg-id
20060420165532.GZ49405@pervasive.com
Ответ на
Re: Quick Performance Poll (Jim Buttafuoco)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Quick Performance Poll "Simon Dale" <sdale@rm.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Milen Kulev" <makulev@gmx.net>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Milen Kulev" <makulev@gmx.net>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
Re: Quick Performance Poll "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Interested in doing a case study for the website? On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:36:25AM -0400, Jim Buttafuoco wrote: > > Simon, > > I have many databases over 1T with the largest being ~6T. All of my databases store telecom data, such as call detail > records. The access is very fast when looking for a small subset of the data. For servers, I am using white box intel > XEON and P4 systems with SATA disks, 4G of memory. SCSI is out of our price range, but if I had unlimited $ I would go > with SCSI /SCSI raid instead. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
