Re: ScanDirections
От
James William Pye
Тема
Re: ScanDirections
Дата
Msg-id
20060220024618.GD68783@lit.jwp.name
Ответ на
Re: ScanDirections (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
ScanDirections James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>
Re: ScanDirections Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: ScanDirections James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>
Re: ScanDirections Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: ScanDirections James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>
Re: ScanDirections Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au>
Re: ScanDirections Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: ScanDirections James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>
Re: ScanDirections Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: ScanDirections Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: ScanDirections Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:04:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > James William Pye writes: > > Small patch that makes ScanDirection a char(f|b|n) instead of a int or > > long or whatever enum makes it. > > Why is this a good idea? A more appropriately sized variable for the data that it will be holding? Certainly not a stunning improvement considering that it's only three bytes. > It strikes me as likely to break things, without really buying anything. I tried to be careful and track everything down. However, I imagine I could have easily missed something, so I understand that concern. In any case, some parts of the patch merely makes some code make use of the sdir.h macros instead of depending on -1/0/1--heapam in particular. At least those portions should be applied, no? -- Regards, James William Pye
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления