Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Jim C. Nasby
Тема
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Дата
Msg-id
20051006221802.GM36108@pervasive.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? "Andrus" <eetasoft@online.ee>
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:40:49PM -0700, CSN wrote:
> 
> --- Scott Marlowe  wrote:
> > 
> > Federated Storage Engine:  Allows MySQL to access
> > tables in other
> > servers like they are here.  No real direct
> > equivalent in PostgreSQL,
> > but dblink provides similar functionality.
> 
> Would that be possible with table partitions? Or
> Slony?

Slony would give you a loose approximation. Table partitioning is
unrelated. Better yet, I don't know of any reason why you can't define a
view using dblink that would duplicate the features of a federated
system. Of course it would be easier if it was in the back-end...
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
От: Jim C. Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
FAQ