Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
От
Jim C. Nasby
Тема
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Дата
Msg-id
20051006221802.GM36108@pervasive.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? "Andrus" <eetasoft@online.ee>
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:40:49PM -0700, CSN wrote: > > --- Scott Marlowe wrote: > > > > Federated Storage Engine: Allows MySQL to access > > tables in other > > servers like they are here. No real direct > > equivalent in PostgreSQL, > > but dblink provides similar functionality. > > Would that be possible with table partitions? Or > Slony? Slony would give you a loose approximation. Table partitioning is unrelated. Better yet, I don't know of any reason why you can't define a view using dblink that would duplicate the features of a federated system. Of course it would be easier if it was in the back-end... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления