Re: prefix btree implementation
От
Jim C. Nasby
Тема
Re: prefix btree implementation
Дата
Msg-id
20051006213127.GG36108@pervasive.com
Ответ на
Re: prefix btree implementation (Qingqing Zhou)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
prefix btree implementation Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
Re: prefix btree implementation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: prefix btree implementation Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: prefix btree implementation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: prefix btree implementation Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: prefix btree implementation Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: prefix btree implementation Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: prefix btree implementation Bricklen Anderson <BAnderson@PresiNET.com>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:40:43PM -0700, Qingqing Zhou wrote: > We do the prefix sharing when we build up index only, never on the fly. So are you saying that inserts of new data wouldn't make any use of this? ISTM that greatly reduces the usefulness, though I'm not objecting because compression during build is probably better than none at all. Is there a technical reason compression can't be used during normal operations? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
