Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Дата
Msg-id 20050913183431.GK6026@ns.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> I'm feeling even more disenchanted with sched_yield now that Marko
> pointed out that the behavior was changed recently.  Here we have a

To be fair, I'm not entirely sure 'recently' is quite the right word.
It sounds like it changed during the 2.5 development cycle; which was
between major kernel releases, and looks like it was around Dec, 2003.
Thanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches