On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:20:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> writes:
> > I agree with this - what would be even better would be a way to create
> > 'subclasses' for things like this, which could then be 'included' easily.
>
> We could decree that a contrib module's script should create a schema
> and shove everything it makes into that schema. Then "DROP SCHEMA CASCADE"
> is all you need to get rid of it. However, you'd probably end up having
> to add this schema to your search path to use the module conveniently.
>
> regards, tom lane
I would prefer that vastly over what I had to deal with this time. Until I
discovered the "untsearch2.sql" script I was seriously considering the
trouble of backing this out <BY HAND> either in a dump or in the online
database.
Either would have been a stupendous amount of work.
Please consider this change in approach - someone else has to have been bit
in the butt by this one other than me by now.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind