On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 01:01:20 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote
> Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp> writes:
> > Any thoughts on the urgency of the move?
>
> How large is your pg_log file? 7.1 was the last release that had the
> transaction ID wraparound limitation (after 4G transactions your
> database fails...). If pg_log is approaching a gig, you had better
> do something PDQ.
Great. Very low use (to this point) BBS and similar things, so it looks
like we'll miss this issue.
> More generally: essentially all of the data-loss bugs we've fixed lately
> existed also in 7.1. The core committee made a policy decision some
> time ago that we wouldn't bother back-patching further than 7.2, however.
> The only reason 7.2 is still getting some patching attention is that it
> was the last pre-schema release, and so there might be some people out
> there with non-schema-aware applications who couldn't conveniently move
> up to 7.3 or later. But once 8.0 is out we'll probably lose interest in
> supporting 7.2 as well.
Thanks for the answers. I think we have good motivation to proceed.
--
Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>