Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> > > Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> > > be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> > > doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.
> >
> > Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
> > query, even if only subtly. But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
> > someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...
>
> If it does nothing, we certainly should remove it from GUC so people
> don't see a meaningless option. We can then keep it in CVS to see if we
> want it later.
Here is the email from May 28 discussing the removal of GUC.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026