Dave Page wrote:
> The problem that I found was that if you update the comment on an
> operator (a trivial task in pgAdmin which is what I was coding at the
> time) it updates the comment on the underlying function - not so good as
> the new comment may no longer make sense when read from the perspective
> of the function. Of course, if the function can be used by different
> operators or even for other uses, then this situation is more likely to
> occur.
>
> Defaulting to the functions comment sounds OK, but I think an update
> should be stored against the operators oid, not the functions.
Yes, agreed. Operator-specific comments are better, if that is what is
specirfied by the user.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026