Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200107301730.f6UHUTJ11296@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > The unusual case here is that deadlock is not checked on request, but > > only after waiting on the lock for a while. This is because deadlock > > detection is an expensive operation. > > But that is what happens. If one of the locks is not obtained, the > algorithm does wait on that lock (after releasing the other locks). > In the case of a deadlock (tom's scenario #1) it would wait forever, > but the deadlock detection will find it in there and break it. OK, I thought you were talking about the LOCK a,b case, not the other case where we had a previous LOCK statement. Sorry. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: