Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
Дата
Msg-id 200102141747.MAA16893@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Tom Lane writes:
> 
> > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> > > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is
> > > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it?
> >
> > I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and
> > I'll object to any attempt to remove the option.
> 
> The description should be updated though:
> http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL
> 
> I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync
> performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do
> if I turn off fsync anyway."

That is a very subtle point, and one I can imagine many people
incorrectly assuming.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fred Yankowski
Дата:
Сообщение: possible to create CVS branch for proposed patch?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Open 7.1 items