Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Дата
Msg-id 199804301517.LAA14561@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Setting the process title from C is messy, but there is a readily
> available reference.  The Berkeley sendmail distribution includes code
> to emulate setproctitle on practically every platform.  See conf.h and
> conf.c in any recent sendmail release.  Warning: it's grotty enough to
> make a strong man weep.  Don't read near mealtime ;-)

Yep, I have seen it.  Good advice.  What does grotty mean?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()