Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Дата
Msg-id 199804300242.WAA01472@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > No reason for the exec().  I believe the only advantage is that it gives
> > us a separate process name in the 'ps' listing.  I have looked into
> > simulating this.
>
>     Under FreeBSD, there is:
>
> setproctitle(3) - set the process title for ps 1
>
>     This isn't available under Solaris though, last I checked...

Not even BSDI, which is BSD 4.4 like FreeBSD.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brett McCormick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()