Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The main problem with using the link as it stands is that it is *highly*
>> unlikely that it will remain valid for the lifespan of the PG 8.3
>> documentation (let alone subsequent versions).  I've been dealing with

> Did you see Alvaro's archive.org URL that showed it was the same in
> September, 2006?

Yeah, which means its half-life is about gone, in my experience.

            regards, tom lane