Hello
On 01/04/2008, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> > I actualized sql/psm patch. This patch can be downloaded from
> > http://www.pgsql.cz/patches/plpgpsm.diff.gz
>
> The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K
> of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or
> regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature that
> so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for.
>
> The duplicativeness of the code with plpgsql doesn't make this prospect
> any more pleasant, either.
>
> The idea would be a lot easier to swallow if the code were refactored
> to avoid the duplication with plpgsql.
>
This is long run and needs hard reorganisation of plpgsql code. And
moving some plpgsql code to core. But I don't expect so plpgpsm code
can be less than 200KB.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> regards, tom lane
>