Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vivek Khera
Тема Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments
Дата
Msg-id 16239.22770.504961.514819@yertle.int.kciLink.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
>>>>> "RT" == Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

RT> hmm... i wonder what would happen if you pushed your sort_mem higher...
RT> on some of our development boxes and upgrade scripts, i push the
RT> sort_mem to 102400 and sometimes even higher depending on the box. this
RT> really speeds up my restores quit a bit (and is generally safe as i make
RT> sure there isn't any other activity going on at the time)

I was just checking, and I already ran test with larger sort_mem.  the
checkpoint segments made more of a difference...

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Garrett Bladow
Дата:
Сообщение: LIKE query running slow
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: restore time: sort_mem vs. checkpoing_segments