Re: pgpool versus sequences
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgpool versus sequences |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 14930.1307025118@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgpool versus sequences (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgpool versus sequences
Re: pgpool versus sequences |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> Yeah -- why is LOCK SEQUENCE foo_seq not allowed? �Seems a simple thing
>> to have.
> It cause a grammar conflict.
That's a lot of work for a purely cosmetic issue, though. What would be
trivial is to let this work:
regression=# create sequence s1;
CREATE SEQUENCE
regression=# begin;
BEGIN
regression=# lock table s1;
ERROR: "s1" is not a table
We should do that anyway, even if we put in the effort to support the
other syntax.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: