Re: 64-bit API for large objects
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 64-bit API for large objects |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13145.1127578391@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 64-bit API for large objects (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 64-bit API for large objects
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For that matter, we can't even guarantee that they work at all: not
>> all platforms even *have* int64 types.
> What platforms that PG supports don't have int64 arithmetic?
We claim to build with any ANSI C compiler, and there is no requirement
for a 64-bit type in ANSI C.
The historical project policy is that we should still build without
such a type, and everything should still work except that the effective
bounds of bigint data correspond to int32 instead of int64 limits.
I see no reason to back off that policy. It's not very much harder
to do it right.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: