Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked
Дата
Msg-id 12914.1188837780@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked  ("Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>)
Ответы Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked  ("Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
"Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org> writes:
> At least for me, the least surprising behaviour would be to
> revert it too. Than the rule becomes "a function is always
> executed in a pseudo-subtransaction that affects only GUCs"

Only if it has at least one SET clause.  The overhead is too high
to insist on this for every function call.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Florian G. Pflug"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Per-function GUC settings: trickier than it looked
Следующее
От: "Trevor Talbot"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tsearch filenames unlikes special symbols and numbers