Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS
От
Neil Conway
Тема
Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS
Дата
Msg-id
1062729142.364.20.camel@tokyo
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 22:13, Relaxin wrote: > Finally, someone who will actually assume/admit that it is returning the > entire result set to the client. > Where as other DBMS manage the records at the server. Is there a reason you can't use cursors (explicitely, or via ODBC if it provides some glue on top of them) to keep the result set on the server? http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/sql-declare.html http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/sql-fetch.html > The next one is the handling of BLOBS. PG handles them like no other system > I have ever come across. Just FYI, you can use both the lo_*() functions, as well as simple bytea/text columns (which can be very large in PostgreSQL). -Neil
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления