Re: Sequence usage patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Rod Taylor
Тема
Re: Sequence usage patch
Дата
в 10:03:00
Msg-id
1054044173.93507.5.camel@jester
Ответ на
Re: Sequence usage patch (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Re: Sequence usage patch Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Re: Sequence usage patch Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Re: Sequence usage patch Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Re: Sequence usage patch Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> 
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 09:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor  writes:
> > Are you ok with the DB2 and draft-spec syntax of NEXT VALUE FOR (where
> > value is not a reserved word)?  Or should I hold onto that until the
> > spec has gone through the final draft / release?
> 
> By that time we'll have done the Oracle-style foo.nextval, and it'll
> become kind of a moot point ;-)

Well, not moot for anyone trying to go between PostgreSQL and a
non-Oracle (or SapDB) database, but certainly of less concern.

-- 
Rod Taylor 

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sequence usage patch
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
FAQ